AI design critique that predicts the questions your design lead will ask — and arms you with the answers. Built by a 12-year UX vet, powered by Claude.
Three elements are fighting for primary attention. The "Get started" CTA, the testimonial card, and the product visual are all weighted equally. Pick one.
Suggested answer: Onboarding analytics show 73% of users hit the empty state first. Optimizing for the dominant moment, not the aspirational one.
You don't lose critiques because your design is bad. You lose them because you couldn't defend it.
Paste a Figma frame URL or upload an image. PNG, JPG, screenshot — whatever you have.
One sentence is fine. Two if you're feeling generous. Crit considers intent, not just pixels.
Predicted questions. Real issues. Defensible decisions. One reframe that makes you reconsider the screen.
Optional: export the Critique Card. Post it on LinkedIn. Watch your network ask what tool you used.
This is the one nobody else does. Crit predicts the actual questions your design lead, PM, or VP will ask in the meeting — and gives you the talking points to defend your decisions before you walk in.
Hierarchy breaks. Accessibility gaps. Design system violations. No vague "consider improving spacing" — concrete, specific, fixable.
Some things look wrong but are right. Crit flags them and gives you the talking points so you don't capitulate in the meeting on a decision that was actually correct.
The provocation that turns a good critique into a great one. The thing your most senior mentor would ask if they had 60 seconds with your design.
Beautiful, branded, anonymized. Designers post these to LinkedIn and Twitter. Every share is social proof — and a small ad for sharper thinking.
There are good AI design tools. Most evaluate the artifact. Crit prepares the designer.
I've sat through twelve years of design critiques. The good ones sharpened me. The bad ones were the ones I walked into unprepared. I built Crit because I wanted the tool I needed at year three — a senior designer in my pocket who could pressure-test my work before the meeting started.
This isn't another AI design wrapper. It's a tool with taste — calibrated against what good critique actually sounds like, not what GPT thinks design criticism should be.
Launching on Product Hunt · LTD pricing only on launch day